Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning Trimble GNSS R12i Receiver (2024)

Start Preamble Start Printed Page 48908

U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security.

Notice of final determination.

This document provides notice that U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has issued a final determination concerning the country of origin of the Trimble GNSS R12i Receiver. Based upon the facts presented, CBP has concluded that the GNSS R12i Receiver is a product of the United States for purposes of U.S. Government procurement and does not undergo a substantial transformation during its final assembly in Thailand.

The final determination was issued on June 4, 2024. A copy of the final determination is attached. Any party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial review of this final determination no later than July 10, 2024.

Start Further Info

Mitchell Emery, Valuation and Special Programs Branch, Regulations and Rulings, Office of Trade, at (202) 325-0321.

End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information

Notice is hereby given that on June 4, 2024, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) issued a final determination concerning the country of origin of Trimble GNSS R12i Receivers for purposes of title III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979. This final determination, HQ H338116, was issued at the request of Trimble, Inc. under procedures set forth at 19 CFR part 177, subpart B, which implements title III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2511-18). In the final determination CBP has concluded that the GNSS R12i Receiver is a product of the United States and does not undergo a substantial transformation during its final assembly in Thailand. The final determination also finds that the GNSS R12i Receiver is exempt from the country of origin marking requirements of 19 CFR 134.32(m).

Section 177.29, CBP Regulations (19 CFR 177.29), provides that a notice of final determination shall be published in the Federal Register within 60 days of the date the final determination is issued. Section 177.30, CBP Regulations (19 CFR 177.30), provides that any party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial review of a final determination within 30 days of publication of such determination in the Federal Register .

Start Signature

Alice A. Kipel,

Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings, Office of Trade.

End Signature

HQ H338116

June 4, 2024

OT:RR:CTF:VS H338116 ME

Category: Origin

John McKenzie

Baker & McKenzie LLP

Two Embarcadero Center, 11th Floor

Facts

Trimble is a Delaware corporation based in Colorado, specializing in the production and design of industrial technology for the agricultural, construction, and geospatial transportation industries. At issue in this case is the GNSS R12i Receiver, which you describe as designed for “surveying and mapping in challenging environments.”

You state that the GNSS R12i Receiver consists of seven primary components, which undergo final assembly into a chassis in Thailand:

Main Board Assembly
Power Supply and Communications Board Assembly
Antenna Element Assembly
Radio Interface
Antenna Low Noise Amplifier
Battery SIM
450MHz Radio

Four of these components, the main board assembly, the power supply and communications board assembly, the antenna element assembly, and the radio interface are manufactured in the United States. Notably, you characterize three of these U.S.-origin components as Printed Circuit Board Assemblies (“PCBAs”). You state that the main board assembly is the primary PCBA, which provides the “essential character” of the GNSS R12i Receiver, including the central processing unit (“CPU”), random access memory (“RAM”), Flash memory module, RF processor, baseband processer, and Global Positioning System (“GPS”) Components. These components are assembled onto the board using Surface Mount Technology (“SMT”) in the United States. You additionally state that the Radio Interface is a separate PCBA with 74 components assembled onto the bare circuit board with SMT. You also state that the power supply and communications board assembly is a PCBA with 526 components assembled onto a circuit board using SMT and includes all communications functions of the GNSS R12i Receiver.

Two of the main components, the antenna low noise amplifier and battery SIM, are produced in Thailand. You state that these “perform subsidiary roles with respect to the GNSS R12i device.” You describe the antenna low noise amplifier as a PCBA with 142 components assembled onto a bare printed circuit board using SMT, which is then shipped to the United States and built into the Antenna Element Assembly. Additionally, you describe the battery SIM as a PCBA produced by assembling five components onto a bare printed circuit board.

The final main component is a 450MHz Radio, which is produced in China. This component is optional; however, you have included it for the purpose of determining the country of origin of the GNSS R12i Receiver. You provide no details about the production process of this component.

You describe the final assembly operations in Thailand as “simple assembly,” consisting “primarily of inserting and fastening [PCBAs] into a chassis.” The final assembly includes the following steps:

1. The primary PCBA, radio interface PCBA, and communications and power supply PCBA are screwed onto a “hot box” subassembly by fastening with two to three screws. They are then subject to a series of sensor tests.

2. The antenna assembly is fastened to the “hot box” with two screws, the Start Printed Page 48909 radio module is installed onto the “hot box” with four screws, and then the “hot box” assembly is subject to a series of signal tests.

3. The keypad is installed onto the chassis with glue and two screws.

4. The battery compartment floor, and battery compartment are assembled and affixed to the chassis with two and four screws respectively.

5. The battery SIM is attached to the chassis with four screws.

6. The “hot box” subassembly with the PCBAs and antenna element are affixed to the chassis with four screws.

7. The battery compartment door is installed to the outside of the chassis with two screws.

8. Various mechanical parts are installed into the chassis.

9. Four compliance labels, overlays and serial number labels are attached to the exterior of the chassis.

10. A series of functional tests are conducted (Leak Test; Calibration Confirmation; Unit input/output Testing; Unit Gyroscope Testing).

On top of this, you state that various subcomponents are used at all stages to produce the main components of the GNSS R12i Receiver. You also state that small mechanical parts and additional subcomponents are added to the product during final assembly. For all these subcomponents, you provide charts showing that the parts originate from over 20 different countries, and you state that no “single country predominates as the source country.” We note that several of these “subcomponents” cost more than items which you have designated as “primary components.” However, the most expensive subcomponents largely relate to GNSS R12i Receiver's outer shell and are not central to the device's functionality.

Issues

1. What is the country of origin of the GNSS R12i Receiver for the purposes of U.S. Government procurement?

2. Is the GNSS R12i Receiver excepted from country of origin marking requirements under 19 CFR 134.32(m)?

Law and Analysis

Country of Origin Determination

CBP issues country of origin advisory rulings and final determinations as to whether an article is or would be a product of a designated country or instrumentality for the purposes of granting waivers of certain “Buy American” restrictions in U.S. law or practice for products offered for sale to the U.S. Government, pursuant to subpart B of Part 177, 19 CFR 177.21-177.31, which implements Title III of the TAA, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2511-2518).

CBP's authority to issue advisory rulings and final determinations is set forth in 19 U.S.C. 2515(b)(1), which states:

For the purposes of this subchapter, the Secretary of the Treasury shall provide for the prompt issuance of advisory rulings and final determinations on whether, under section 2518(4)(B) of this title, an article is or would be a product of a foreign country or instrumentality designated pursuant to section 2511(b) of this title (Emphasis added).

The Secretary of the Treasury's authority mentioned above, along with other customs revenue functions, are delegated to CBP in the Appendix to 19 CFR part 0—Treasury Department Order No. 100-16, 68 FR 28,322 (May 23, 2003).

The rule of origin set forth under 19 U.S.C. 2518(4)(B) states:

An article is a product of a country or instrumentality only if (i) it is wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of that country or instrumentality, or (ii) in the case of an article which consists in whole or in part of materials from another country or instrumentality, it has been substantially transformed into a new and different article of commerce with a name, character, or use distinct from that of the article or articles from which it was so transformed.

See also19 CFR 177.22(a).

In rendering advisory rulings and final determinations for purposes of U.S. Government procurement, CBP applies the provisions of subpart B of Part 177 consistent with the Federal Procurement Regulation (“FAR”). See19 CFR 177.21. In this regard, CBP recognizes that the FAR restricts the U.S. Government's purchase of products to U.S.-made or designated country end products for acquisitions subject to the TAA. See48 CFR 25.403(c)(1).

The FAR, 48 CFR 25.003, defines “U.S.-made end product” as:

. . . an article that is mined, produced, or manufactured in the United States or that is substantially transformed in the United States into a new and different article of commerce with a name, character, or use distinct from that of the article or articles from which it was transformed.

Section 25.003 defines “designated country end product” as:

a WTO GPA [World Trade Organization Government Procurement Agreement] country end product, an FTA [Free Trade Agreement] country end product, a least developed country end product, or a Caribbean Basin country end product.

Section 25.003 defines “WTO GPA country end product” as an article that:

(1) Is wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of a WTO GPA country; or

(2) In the case of an article that consists in whole or in part of materials from another country, has been substantially transformed in a WTO GPA country into a new and different article of commerce with a name, character, or use distinct from that of the article or articles from which it was transformed. The term refers to a product offered for purchase under a supply contract, but for purposes of calculating the value of the end product includes services (except transportation services) incidental to the article, provided that the value of those incidental services does not exceed that of the article itself.

Thailand is not a “designated country,” and products of Thailand are not eligible for U.S. Government procurement.

In order to determine whether a substantial transformation occurs when components of various origins are assembled into completed products, CBP considers the totality of the circ*mstances and makes such determinations on a case-by-case basis. The country of origin of the item's components, extent of the processing that occurs within a country, and whether such processing renders a product with a new name, character, and use are primary considerations in such cases. Additionally, factors such as the resources expended on product design and development, the extent and nature of post-assembly inspection and testing procedures, and worker skill required during the actual manufacturing process will be considered when determining whether a substantial transformation has occurred. No one factor is determinative.

You argue that because the key components of the GNSS R12i Receiver are manufactured in the United States, it is a product of the United States. You further argue that the final production in Thailand is “simple assembly” and Start Printed Page 48910 does not result in a substantial transformation. In support of this, you cite the U.S. Court of International Trade's opinion in Energizer Battery, Inc. v. United States, 190 F. Supp. 3d 1308 (2016). Energizer involved the manufacture of a flashlight, where all of the components of the flashlight were of Chinese origin, except for a white LED and a hydrogen getter. The components were imported into the United States and assembled into the finished Generation II flashlight. The Energizer Battery court reviewed the “name, character and use” test utilized in determining whether a substantial transformation had occurred and noted, citing Uniroyal, Inc. v United States, 542 F. Supp. 1026, 1031 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1982), that when “the post-importation processing consists of assembly, courts have been reluctant to find a change in character, particularly when the imported articles do not undergo a physical change.” Energizer Battery at 1318. In addition, the court noted that “when the end-use was pre-determined at the time of importation, courts have generally not found a change in use.” Energizer Battery at 1319, citing as an example, National Hand Tool Corp. v. United States, 16 C.I.T. 308, 312 (1992), aff'd, 989 F.2d 1201 (Fed. Cir. 1993). Furthermore, courts have considered the nature of the assembly, i.e., whether it is a simple assembly or more complex, such that individual parts lose their separate identities and become integral parts of a new article.

With regards to electronic equipment, CBP has found that circuit boards undergo a substantial transformation into PCBAs when various components are assembled onto the board via SMT. See C.S.D. 85-25, 19 Cust. Bull. 844 (1985) (determining that the assembly of the PCBA involved a very large number of components and a significant number of different operations, required a relatively significant period of time as well as skill, attention to detail, and quality control, and resulted in significant economic benefit to the beneficiary developing country from the standpoint of both value added to the PCBA and the overall employment generated thereby). Additionally, CBP has found that the mere attachment of wires to a PCBA and installation into a case, along with minor tuning processes, does not result in a substantial transformation. See Headquarters Ruling (“HQ”) 561232, dated April 20, 2004.

As you further highlight, the programing of a device may also affect its country of origin. In Data General v. United States, 4 C.I.T. 182 (1982), the court determined that the programming of a foreign PROM (“Programmable Read-Only Memory” chip) in the United States substantially transformed the PROM into a U.S. article. In the United States, the programming bestowed upon each integrated circuit its electronic function, that is, its “memory” which could be retrieved. A distinct physical change was affected in the PROM by the opening or closing of the fuses, depending on the method of programming. The essence of the article, its interconnections or stored memory, was established by programming. Texas Instruments v. United States, 681 F.2d 778, 782 (CCPA 1982) (stating the substantial transformation issue is a “mixed question of technology and customs law”).

Accordingly, the programming of a device that defines its use generally constitutes substantial transformation. See HQ 735027, dated September 7, 1993 (programming blank media (EEPROM) with instructions that allow it to perform certain functions that prevent piracy of software constitutes a substantial transformation); but see HQ 734518, dated June 28, 1993 (motherboards are not substantially transformed by the implanting of the central processing unit on the board because, whereas in Data General use was being assigned to the PROM, the use of the motherboard had already been determined when the importer imported it).

CBP has elaborated that mere downloading of software onto a device alone is typically not enough to show a substantial transformation, as “[p]rogramming involves writing, testing and implementing code necessary to make a computer function in a certain way.” See HQ H241177, dated December 3, 2013 (holding that the downloading of U.S.-origin software in Singapore did not constitute a substantial transformation in Singapore or the United States, and therefore the country of origin was Malaysia where the final assembly of the hardware took place); see also HQ H240199, dated March 10, 2015 (holding that the notebook computer was not substantially transformed when the computer was assembled in Country A, imported into Country F, and Country D-origin BIOS was downloaded). However, in cases where the downloading of software onto a PCBA is combined with more complex operations to its firmware and hardware, which are essential to the device's operation, CBP has determined that a substantial transformation has occurred. See HQ 563012, dated May 4, 2004 (holding that the PCBA and casing that were manufactured for a switch in China, were substantially transformed in the United States or Hong Kong, where U.S.-origin software was loaded, and the PCBA was further assembled with a power supply, fans, and an A/C filter of various origins to form the final fabric switch, as the switch was transformed into a functional device).

You also argue that the main PCBA, once fully assembled and programmed, contains the “essential character” of the GNSS R12i Receiver. CBP has issued multiple opinions addressing this issue. For instance, in HQ H301910, dated August 5, 2019, which concerned mailing machine engines, CBP determined that the main PCBA, the print control firmware, and the print head constituted the primary and fundamental essence of the mailing machine engine because these components controlled the engine's function, operations, and enabled the printing of the correct postage. In particular, the main PCBA was composed of components essential to the fundamental function and primary purpose of the engine, including the CPU, the memory, and the Field-Programmable Gate Array, which combined to form the “brain” of the device. CBP held that, inasmuch as the main PCBA, the print control firmware, and the print head were all produced in Japan, the country of origin of the mailing engine machine was Japan.

In HQ H302801, dated October 3, 2019, CBP considered the country of origin of certain “Fitbit” smart watches. The case involved multiple PCBAs from Taiwan or the Philippines, which were assembled together into a final product in China by installing PCBAs into a housing with a vibration motor, battery, display, and wristband. The assembly did not alter the PCBAs' functional or physical attributes, and the PCBAs had a predetermined end-use as the electronic “brain” of the device. Additionally, the final assembly in China was neither complex nor time intensive, whereas the assembly of the PCBAs required complex equipment for SMT, a high level of expertise, and involved more components and subassemblies than the final assembly in China. Therefore, the country of origin was where the PCBAs were manufactured, in Taiwan or the Philippines.

However, in HQ H304677, dated April 21, 2023, CBP found that the country of origin of laser printers was China, even though the main PCBAs were manufactured and installed into the final product in Mexico. In that case, the printer transports which included all the mechanical components of the device, such as the housing, scanner, power supply, and fuser, were Start Printed Page 48911 manufactured in China. The PCBAs were manufactured in Mexico, where components were added to the board with SMT, and U.S. and Philippine-origin firmware was downloaded onto the PCBA. The PCBAs were then installed into the printers and the devices underwent a series of tests. CBP determined that the PCBAs were not the only fundamental functioning component of the printer, as the Chinese printer transports also provided character to the final article. Furthermore, since all of the mechanical printing functions were imparted by the Chinese transports, the country of origin was China.

In the instant case, based on the totality of the circ*mstances and consistent with the pertinent authorities, we find that the country of origin of the GNSS R12i Receiver is the United States. We agree that the U.S.-origin primary PCBA contains the “essential character” of the GNSS R12i Receiver. Like in HQ H302801, the PCBA originates from the United States, where most of the required production took place. This production process included assembling hundreds electronic of components onto the PCBA using SMT, including the CPU, RAM, GPS components, and communications components, which are central to the device's operation. Furthermore, it involved programing and configuring the primary PCBA with Trimble's proprietary U.S.-origin software, which is required in order for the device to function and defines it use. This case is unlike HQ H304677, which involved U.S.-origin software programmed onto a Mexican-origin PCBA, because here both the software and the primary PCBA originate from the same country. Additionally, in that case all other fundamental functional components of the printer were produced in China, whereas in this instance, most of the primary components of the GNSS R12i Receiver were assembled in the United States. Furthermore, once they are fully assembled, all U.S.-origin components have a predetermined end-use in the GNSS R12i Receiver when exported to Thailand and installed into the device.

Furthermore, we agree that the assembly in Thailand is simple assembly that does not result in a substantial transformation. It primarily involves placing the PCBAs into a “hot box” subassembly and then affixing the “hot box,” antenna, battery, and keypad to the chassis, in contrast to the complex SMT performed in the United States. While the two Thai-origin main components are also PCBAs and are produced using complex SMT, they play a subsidiary role within the device. They do not undergo any programming, or process any communications or navigational information, which is required for the GNSS R12i Receiver to function. The U.S.-origin components are notably more complex, which is why more worker hours are required to produce the U.S.-origin components than all Thailand operations combined. Therefore, based on the totality of the circ*mstances, we determine that the final assembly in Thailand does not result in a substantial transformation.

Accordingly, we find that the country of origin of the finished GNSS R12i Receiver for the purpose of U.S. Government procurement is the United States.

Country of Origin Marking

Section 304 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1304), provides that unless excepted, every article of foreign origin imported into the United States shall be marked in a conspicuous place as legibly, indelibly, and permanently as the nature of the article (or its container) will permit, in such a manner as to indicate to an ultimate purchaser in the United States, the English name of the country of origin of the article. See also19 CFR 134.11. Section 134.32(m) of the CBP Regulations provides several exceptions to the marking requirement. Specifically, “products of the United States exported and returned” are exempt from the country of origin marking requirement. 19 CFR 134.32(m).

For the purposes of the marking requirement, the term “country of origin” is defined under 19 CFR 134.1(b), which adopts the same “substantial transformation” rule as the TAA and the FAR. See19 U.S.C. 2518(4)(B); FAR, 48 CFR 25.003. Specifically, Section 134.1(b) of the CBP Regulations states that:

“Country of origin” means the country of manufacture, production, or growth of any article of foreign origin entering the United States. Further work or material added to an article in another country must effect a substantial transformation in order to render such other country the “country of origin” within the meaning of this part;

As a discussed above, for the purposes of Section 308(4)(B) of the TAA, the GNSS R12i Receiver is a product of the United States, where the PCBAs are produced, and it does not undergo a substantial transformation during the final assembly in Thailand. Having already reached this determination, we also find that the GNSS R12i Receiver is a product of the United States for the purpose of country of origin marking. Furthermore, the GNSS R12i Receiver is “exported and returned” within the meaning of 19 CFR 134.32(m) and is therefore excepted from the country of origin marking requirement.

Holding

Based on the information outlined above, for the purposes of U.S. Government procurement and country of origin marking, the GNSS R12i Receiver is a product of the United States and is not substantially transformed by its final assembly in Thailand. Furthermore, as a product of the United States, it is excepted from the country of origin marking requirement when exported and returned to the United States, under 19 CFR 134.32(m).

Notice of this final determination will be given in the Federal Register , as required by 19 CFR 177.29. Any party-at-interest other than the party which requested this final determination may request, pursuant to 19 CFR 177.31, that CBP reexamine the matter anew and issue a new final determination. Pursuant to 19 CFR 177.30, any party-at-interest may, within 30 days of publication of the Federal Register Notice referenced above, seek judicial review of this final determination before the U.S. Court of International Trade.

Sincerely,

Alice A. Kipel,

Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings, Office of Trade.

End Supplemental Information

[FR Doc. 2024-12617 Filed 6-7-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-14-P